Posts

Building a Business Case for HR Technology – Ask Questions to Get Grounded in Business Strategy

I have to thank our friends at HRMAC (the Human Resources Management Association of Chicago) for driving this topic to the top of the list lately. That group has asked me to moderate a panel on how to build a business case and create a ROI for HR Technology. The event can be found here on our blog, and you can register for it by going to our events page. It is being held on November 12.

What is HR Technology? Exactly as it sounds. Any kind of technology that is used by HR and enables the line. Payroll, contingent labor, applicant tracking, enterprise planning, onboarding, offboarding, performance management, intranets, sharepoint, etc. These all are viable types of HR Technology.

But the reasons to use these types of tools has changed over the years. I had discussions with several leaders in the industry (listed below) and crafting a business plan or ROI case is little different than it used to be. Our panel includes:

  • Bill Gilbert – leader at FutureStep and a former CFO
  • Jacqueline Kuhn – a long time expert, and full time consultant in the evaluation and implementation of HR technology
  • Shirley Roberts – Manager of Organization Transformation at US Cellular
  • Bryon Abramowitz – consultant at Knowledge Infusion, specializing in HR technology

I have asked our panelists and members of the audience of November 12 to comment on this blog post to keep the conversation going.

ROI 10 years ago is not ROI now
You have to first realize that. We have advanced the use of technology so much in our everyday office lives, that most organizations have leaned out administration and people more than they think. We have fewer opportunities to reduce staff as a result of technology. As a simple example, the introduction of a new expense reporting system will likely change out people using a Microsoft office template, rather than people handwriting. Of course other advantages will be included, but the initial savings of time is greatly reduced.

We Enable Different Stuff
What we use technology for now is different than it was years ago, and to make the idea even more complex we have more choices. You have to really think what are the 1, 2, or 3 behaviors or processes that you want to focus on, and then match the appropriate technology.

The panel that I am moderating is going to talk about building a business case, and identifying key performance indicators or ROI measures that you can use.

To get started, start by asking yourself some questions that help you understand if you have the right leadership around this technology project, if the vision is clear or blurry, and if a successful project is even feasible.

Leadership – Do you have the support you need?
Did you collect lessons learned from previous technology evals or installs?
Did management tell you to build a plan that includes tech?
Will the technology be abandoned under pressure?
Are there competing objectives or initiatives internally?
Does management respond well to change?
Is management going to micro-manage? (this is bad)
Do you have a project mission?
Do you have support for having a technology partner?
Are you operating under severe constraints? (pressure is bad)
Has your team had failure in regards to technology before?
Key stakeholders identified?

Vision – How well can you see?
Did you do a risk analysis?
Does management really understand the end user problem?
Critical success factors identified?
Did you SWOT?
What is the worst case scenario to the install or project undertaking?
Can you prototype or test? Can you replicate and scale?
Take longer than 12 months to implement? (bad)
Do you have an exit strategy from the plan?
Are Social or behavioral impacts supporting?
Has management been asking lots of questions? (this is good)
Do you have alternatives?
Is this a silver bullet? (this is bad)

Feasibility – can you really do this successfully?
Strong commitment from management?
Clear vision statement?
Have you documented all your findings and research to produce the business case?
Did you do an organizational change analysis?
Is this technically, politically, and financially viable?
Big gap between what is done now and what you are proposing?
Did you estimate the workload?
How are you managing quality?
Do you have multiple options, each of which will solve the problem? (if not, this is bad)
Got budget? Is it appropriated?
System costs, staffing costs, training costs, implementation costs, initial start up costs, and maintenance costs captured?

There are so many more questions you need to ask just to make sure you can even get this done. Doing the RFP and signing a contract is easy. The vendors have made it easy for you.

Make sure you are grounded in the business strategy, and enabling the business. Get leadership buy in and support, have a strong path and vision, and make sure that your project is well scoped and viable.

Then build a strong business case, and present your findings. With approval and strong roadmap, you should have a much more rewarding experience and impact to the organization with the technology.

Companies Taking Similar Recruiting Approaches in Down Economy

On March 20, 2009, I moderated a panel of recruiting leaders in Chicago about how this economy has affected their processes and the techniques they use in order to lead effective recruiting organizations. The Human Resources Management Association of Chicago was kind enough to ask me to facilitate. Prior to the questioning the panel in front of 75 leaders in staffing and HR, I spent about 90 minutes with each panelist reviewing their practices in staffing, so we could build a robust presentation.

The panel included David Meija of Pepsi Americas, Darcy Zulpo of Citadel, and Melissa McMahon of CDW. 

Preparing for the Panel
Realize that as I moderated the panel, I wanted to keep the panel and audience engaged. I really wanted to get our panel to share as much as they could about transforming their organizations, while having the audience heard. Keeping a robust discussion was important, as my conversations with staffing leaders recently have had overtones of concern and confusion around maintaining value when requisitions are low. This has rung true even more in organizations where supporting functions like HR, finance, and IT have a weaker strategic position. I really have not seen any trends on “Recruiting’s value” based on the size of company or an industry – it’s the mindset of the company that has been the common trend. That observation proved true with these panelists and their organizations, as each had varied in industry, size, and design, but clearly all three leaders have influence within their organizations, and the respect (and ear) of executive leadership.

This Review…
With the permission of our panelists, I have taken the liberty of paraphrasing the answers to the questions that I asked during the panel, and offered some takeaway action items and suggestions. I have added some commentary throughout that reflects insights that I have seen from other companies and also reflects the discussions that I had one on one with each panelist.

Post Article…
A word of advice before you start moving the chess pieces internally – think of change management as a boat that needs to be turned. To drive this analogy home, realize that recruiting may be behind the wheel, but is rarely the captain of any ship and never on a boat alone. You can turn the wheel, but your turn has to match the mindset of your passengers (and how fast they can tolerate a turn), the size of the ship (and how fast it can turn without tipping over or be deemed an emergency), and how the captain and first mate think the turn has been executed. If your company is a cruise ship and you spin that wheel too fast, an alarm goes off, passengers lose balance, and the officer core starts asking questions quick. If you are a speedboat, that same wheel turn could be expected, admired, and even applauded.

Thanks to the panelists, HRMAC, and the attendees for making this a great event. We are doing it again on May 19th, with the staffing leaders from Sara Lee, Exelon, and Career Education Corporation.

(Open the PDF to this lengthy article…)